4.1 The Body: Ashes and Dust.
Let’s note two things about 'Adam' -- the first body. The writer in Genesis is clearly playing on words. Adam means human and later refers to the man, Adam. (The story repeatedly calls him ‘the man’ – which is the word adam. The same word later becomes the proper name, Adam.) Adam is also a play on 'damah' the Hebrew word for ground. Adam, the human, was taken from the ground, the dust. The breath of the Creator is given to Adam. It is life-giving. Breath is vitally important to the body and to the story of humanity. Adam is given life in the image of the Creator. That image is male and female.
We are so accustomed to understanding the idea that Eve
was fashioned from Adam's rib that we cannot tolerate the reasonable but contrary
idea that Eve was one full side of Adam. (Of the 42 times the Hebrew
word is used, only in the story of ‘Eve’ is it translated as rib. The other times
it is translated as a side.) This is widely debated. It is suggested that
if the story is one of Adam’s rib, Eve is minimized, secondary, a subsidiary. But
the image of the Creator is not complete without Eve. We think the story is
telling us that she comes after he. But she existed
previously ‘together with’ he. The Human adam, versus the male
Adam, is the image of God, “both male and female.” (This has implications on how we construe human gender and the 'gender' of the Creator.) Adam needs to cling to Eve to become one again. Adam the Man never gives
birth after this.
Our minds have difficulty comprehending that the story could
be any different than the story we have been told. This incongruence, a
dissonance, is the essence of The Praxis Project. When confronted with a different story, can you believe something that you don’t believe? Or better (or worse),
what do you do with a contradiction in your beliefs?